1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (159 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 MG ZT. (158 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT weights approximately 30 kg more than 1995 Ford Ranger.
Because 1995 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (305 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZT. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 2004 MG ZT | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Ranger | ZT |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2760 mm |