1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2004 Subaru Forester is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Forester (162 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1995 Ford Ranger. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 8 kg more than 2004 Subaru Forester.
Because 2004 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Forester. (225 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 2004 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Ranger | Forester |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 162 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 225 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2530 mm |