1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (159 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2006 Ford Mustang. (130 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 75 kg more than 1995 Ford Ranger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (461 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Ranger. (305 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Ford Ranger 2006 Ford Mustang
Make Ford Ford
Model Ranger Mustang
Year Released 1995 2006
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4014 cc 4600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 159 HP 130 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 461 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1455 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2730 mm