1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Ranger | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Ranger | KB |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2982 cc | 2499 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 78 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3060 mm |
