1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 207. (88 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Because 1995 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 207. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | 207 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2610 mm |