1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Rover 75

To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 248 kg more than 2006 Rover 75.

Because 1995 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Ford Ranger 2006 Rover 75
Make Ford Rover
Model Ranger 75
Year Released 1995 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2982 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 257 Nm 215 Nm
Torque RPM 2650 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1428 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4000 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2760 mm