1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 470 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1995 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (305 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2480 mm |