1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (159 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 185 kg more than 1995 Ford Ranger.
Because 1995 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (305 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2580 mm |