1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (307 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1995 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Ranger | Avalanche |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 307 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 335 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3310 mm |