1995 Ford Royale vs. 1963 Simca 1500
To start off, 1995 Ford Royale is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1500 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1500. (68 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1500.
Because 1963 Simca 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Simca 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca 1500. (124 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Royale | 1963 Simca 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Royale | 1500 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1475 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |