1995 Ford Royale vs. 1966 Mini MK I
To start off, 1995 Ford Royale is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Royale | 1966 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | Royale | MK I |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2040 mm |
