1995 Ford Royale vs. 1977 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1995 Ford Royale is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 1500.
Because 1977 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Royale | 1977 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Royale | 1500 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1977 |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2430 mm |