1995 Ford Royale vs. 1981 Kia Brisa
To start off, 1995 Ford Royale is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1981 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1981 Kia Brisa.
Because 1981 Kia Brisa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Kia Brisa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Kia Brisa. (69 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Kia Brisa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Royale | 1981 Kia Brisa | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Royale | Brisa |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 69 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2270 mm |
