1995 Ford Royale vs. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1995 Ford Royale is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,351 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1995 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (291 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Royale | 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Royale | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1995 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 291 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2740 mm |