1995 Ford Royale vs. 2001 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2001 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Royale would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Terrano II (117 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1995 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Royale.
Because 2001 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Royale. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Terrano II (197 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan Terrano II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Royale | 2001 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Royale | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |