1995 Ford Royale vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Royale would be higher. At 2,982 cc, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1995 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Royale.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Royale. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (280 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Royale. (173 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Royale | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Royale | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2982 cc |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2670 mm |
