1995 Ford Royale vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Royale would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Royale (109 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Royale | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Royale | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 173 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1810 mm |