1995 Ford Royale vs. 2008 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2008 Suzuki Reno is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Royale would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Suzuki Reno (127 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1995 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Royale | 2008 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Royale | Reno |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |