1995 Ford Royale vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Royale would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1995 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Royale.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Royale | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Royale | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2640 mm |