1995 Ford Royale vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Royale would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (124 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1995 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (155 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Royale | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Royale | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1591 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |