1995 Ford Royale vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Royale would be higher.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Royale | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Ford | Fisker |
Model | Royale | Karma |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3160 mm |