1995 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1995 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 216 kg more than 1995 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Thunderbird | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Thunderbird | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3797 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3130 mm |
