1995 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1995 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 676 kg more than 1995 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Thunderbird | 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Thunderbird | Corniche |
Year Released | 1995 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3030 mm |