1995 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 1995 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Thunderbird (230 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 734 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Thunderbird (447 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Thunderbird | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Thunderbird | 100 1.4 D |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 1358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 89 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 70.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 81.3 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |