1995 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1996 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 380 kg more than 1995 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Thunderbird | 1996 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Ford | Mahindra |
| Model | Thunderbird | Armada |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4310 mm |
