1995 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 669 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1995 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Thunderbird | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Thunderbird | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2770 mm |