1995 Ford Tracer vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1995 Ford Tracer is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1995 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Tracer weights approximately 5 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Tracer | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tracer | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |