1995 Ford Tracer vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1995 Ford Tracer is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1995 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Tracer.
Because 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (172 Nm @ 4 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Tracer | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tracer | Celeste |
Year Released | 1995 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |