1995 Ford Windstar vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1995 Ford Windstar is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Windstar weights approximately 210 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Windstar | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Windstar | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1830 mm |
