1995 Ford Windstar vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 635 kg more than 1995 Ford Windstar.
Because 2002 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Windstar | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Windstar | Econoline |
Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 198 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2020 mm |