1995 Holden Commodore vs. 2007 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2007 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Holden Commodore (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2007 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2007 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Holden Commodore (295 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Holden Commodore | 2007 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Holden | Proton |
| Model | Commodore | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2610 mm |
