1995 Holden Nova vs. 2004 MCC Silverpulse
To start off, 2004 MCC Silverpulse is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 MCC Silverpulse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Silverpulse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 MCC Silverpulse has automatic transmission and 1995 Holden Nova has manual transmission. 1995 Holden Nova will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 MCC Silverpulse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Holden Nova | 2004 MCC Silverpulse | |
| Make | Holden | MCC |
| Model | Nova | Silverpulse |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
