1995 Holden Nova vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1995 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1995 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Holden Nova | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
| Model | Nova | Polo |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2470 mm |
