1995 Holden Statesman vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1995 Holden Statesman. (221 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1995 Holden Statesman.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Holden Statesman (370 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 1995 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore. 1995 Holden Statesman has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Holden Statesman will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Holden Statesman | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Statesman | Commodore |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 370 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |