1995 Honda Argento Viva vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1995 Honda Argento Viva is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,451 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 Honda Argento Viva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Honda Argento Viva (188 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Honda Argento Viva should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Honda Argento Viva weights approximately 470 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Honda Argento Viva (237 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Honda Argento Viva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Honda Argento Viva | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Honda | Zastava |
Model | Argento Viva | 102 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2451 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 188 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2160 mm |