1995 Hyundai HCD-III vs. 1980 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Hyundai HCD-III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III (244 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1995 Hyundai HCD-III is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Mazda Cosmo has automatic transmission and 1995 Hyundai HCD-III has manual transmission. 1995 Hyundai HCD-III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mazda Cosmo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Hyundai HCD-III | 1980 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Hyundai | Mazda |
Model | HCD-III | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 93 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |