1995 Hyundai HCD-III vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Hyundai HCD-III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Hyundai HCD-III would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1995 Hyundai HCD-III. (244 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1995 Hyundai HCD-III.
Because 1995 Hyundai HCD-III is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1995 Hyundai HCD-III has manual transmission. 1995 Hyundai HCD-III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Hyundai HCD-III | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Hyundai | Mazda |
Model | HCD-III | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 273 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |