1995 Hyundai HCD-III vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Hyundai HCD-III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Hyundai HCD-III would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III (244 HP) has 136 more horse power than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda BT-50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Hyundai HCD-III | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Hyundai | Mazda |
| Model | HCD-III | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
