1995 Hyundai Lantra vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1995 Hyundai Lantra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Hyundai Lantra (89 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Hyundai Lantra should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 50 kg more than 1995 Hyundai Lantra.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Hyundai Lantra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Hyundai Lantra. (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Hyundai Lantra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Hyundai Lantra | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Hyundai | Jeep |
| Model | Lantra | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2040 mm |
