1995 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1960 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Volkswagen Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | 1960 Volkswagen Beetle | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
| Model | XJ220 | Beetle |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3492 cc | 1192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
