1995 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 (968 Nm) has 723 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300. (245 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | XJ220 | 300 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3492 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 125 HP |
| Torque | 968 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
