1995 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Jaguar XJ220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 (968 Nm) has 615 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (353 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile has automatic transmission and 1995 Jaguar XJ220 has manual transmission. 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jaguar XJ220 | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJ220 | Profile |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3492 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 206 HP |
Torque | 968 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |