1995 Jaguar XJS vs. 1976 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jaguar XJS | 1976 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
Model | XJS | Polo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1976 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 39 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2410 mm |