1995 Jaguar XJS vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2004 MG TF. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2004 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jaguar XJS | 2004 MG TF | |
Make | Jaguar | MG |
Model | XJS | TF |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |