1995 Jaguar XJS vs. 2006 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2006 Mini Cooper is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 519 kg more than 2006 Mini Cooper.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJS (377 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mini Cooper. (255 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jaguar XJS | 2006 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | XJS | Cooper |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 377 Nm | 255 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 85.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |