1995 Jaguar XJS vs. 2007 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1995 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1995 Jaguar XJS.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1995 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1995 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jaguar XJS | 2007 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJS | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 244 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |