1995 Jaguar XJS vs. 2010 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Outback (256 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1995 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1995 Jaguar XJS.
Because 2010 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Jaguar XJS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 1995 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1995 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jaguar XJS | 2010 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Jaguar | Subaru |
Model | XJS | Outback |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 256 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |