1995 Jaguar XJS vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jaguar XJS | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XJS | Matrix |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |