1995 Jaguar XJS vs. 2012 Opel Vivaro
To start off, 2012 Opel Vivaro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2012 Opel Vivaro. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Vivaro.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Vivaro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jaguar XJS | 2012 Opel Vivaro | |
Make | Jaguar | Opel |
Model | XJS | Vivaro |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 90 L |