1995 Jaguar XJS vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (227 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1995 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1995 Jaguar XJS.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Jaguar XJS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jaguar XJS | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XJS | Outlander |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 24 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |